You could argue that knowing that map can handle nulls is essential to being a good developer, but I appreciate it when someone already made it clear how nulls are handled. However, it can be pain in steams when stream contains Optionals. IMO the problem with Optional is that it is not designed as a proper Maybe/Option type - as it should have been. Contribute to JetBrains/kotlin development by creating an account on GitHub. But … Join the DZone community and get the full member experience. If something can be optional, one would rather assign a reasonable default value than accept an optional parameter. To access properties and methods of … Jetbrains? annotations are significantly more efficient. Isn’t it better to eliminate nulls as soon as possible? JVM 10 might (hopefully will) have value objects to argue against that cost factor. Kotlin offers two built-in functions with this behavior — takeIf and takeUntil. Please note that the right side expression will only be called if the left side expression is null. Unlike some languages such as Kotlin and Python, Java doesn’t provide built-in support for optional parameter values. Sometimes we need a function where we can pass n number of parameters, and the value of n can be decided at runtime. :), which allows us to set the default value in case of null or when throwing an exception: I hope reading this article will help you leverage your Optional experience to quickly learn Kotlin's null safety features. apart from the fully standardized, consistent and well defined methods map , flatMap. Callers of a method must supply all of the variables defined in the method declaration.In this article, we’ll explore some strategies for dealing with optional parameters in Java. I might have forgotten some of the definitions of a Monad but I don’t think so. It should not matter whether you call map on a list, stream, option, or whatever else - and not the ugly and confusing ? Ok, you have defined the realtorImageUrl not null and kotlin does not permit to set it null. Kotlin provides us to achieve the same by defining a parameter of a function as vararg. …. Nullability is not represented by a type and simple mapping turns out to be working fine. Can you guarantee that you will remember to deal with all such values for all database calls in some other way now and in all future? Moshi 1.6was recently released with a brand new Kotlin code gen artifact. You can declare a function in Kotlin using the fun keyword. Do you create Kotlin API using Optional (or are you talking Java API only)? The annotations are significantly more efficient if they are checked by some proper tool. Granted, it’s nice when risk getting a null (e.g., from a Java API) or internally in a class because the Optional is not designed for use in fields (here is why it should have been a proper Option/Maybe-type). Both functions can coexist when non-null arguments are passed. Kotlin has checks at the beginning of all public functions to ensure nullability is not broken by java and in the java world you have to check for null in any case. Using Kotlin Default Parameter Values when JSON value is null and Kotlin parameter type is Non-Nullable #130. 1. Supported and developed by JetBrains Supported and developed by JetBrains As Kotlin developers, we love designing method contracts around non-nulls, avoiding optional types as part of the parameter signature. I see the idea, but it’s messy. Sort model properties to place required parameters before optional parameters. Kotlin has a run() method to execute some operation on a nullable reference. However, now you risk a false sense of security, because all of your nulls and sources of it is well defined, right? Note that I am not entirely sure whether : Any is needed for the type parameter: In “pure” functional programming, there are no exceptions as they break the call flow. In my example, a fellow developer can read from top to bottom and understand that let will never be called on a null. In the following code, a method "foo" is updated with a newer version. Kotlin Null Safety. For pure Kotlin applications, I would consider null over Optional, but I need more experience to make a decision. In what way are nullable types in kotlin different from a Monad? T? The JDK docs actually say not to use Optional in APIs, as it was designed for the stream use case, but the Java library itself doesn’t follow that advice everywhere so it’s probably a lost cause. @rohdef To be fair, Kotlin doesn’t really have “Null” in the classical sense of being a member of every type. They come from a functional programming background which only lately became more popular again so unless you have a background in those you wouldn’t know them. Optional findById (ID var1); Using this API out of the box would force us to deal with cumbersome Java Optionals. Recap of Null-Safety in Kotlin. You just need to pass the required number of parameters in the function name like this -Following is the general syntax of declaring a function in Kotlin.Every function declaration has a function name, a list of comma-separated parameters, an optional return type, and a method bod… Since we are implementing in Kotlin we would like to use Kotlin Nullables instead and as it turned out we can achieve this very easily. I think it is worth giving Kotlin a try if only to expand your programming horizons. Throwing the exception is the last thing where you are basically returning the result to JAX-RS so it can generate 404 HTTP response. After that, we will go through detail explanation of named arguments in kotlin. Here is an example. It’s a workaround for a bad language design. Why would you want to check for null as the last step? How so? :. If there is a need for a real error processing (e.g. You would have to add throwNotFoundIfNull at each and every place. In our case, we also need to use the safe call operator to skip the calculation for null values: In Optional filter allows us to remove the value inside if the provided predicate test returns false. For Java iterop, I would always go with Optional. Kotlin for Server Side. Kotlin is an exciting programming language that's concise, has immutable variables, and almost always gets rid of null pointer exceptions. I have a number of steps, but I only want to do something with the actions. Notice that we are using here our String.toSlug() extension to provide a default argument to the slug parameter of Article constructor. There are a multitude of reasons to avoid it, and what I’ve seen of arguments for is IMO claims of pragmatism that will turn out to be fallacies once one looks further into them. It might surprise you, but for many people those functions are not well known or understood. Every time you see a ? Optional usage requires creating a new object for the wrapper every time some value is wrapped or transformed to another type — with the exclusion of when the Optional is empty (singleton empty Optional is used). That means you can leave … Kotlin embraces this by defaulting to finalizing classes etc. E.g. Code that works on instances of Optional needs to handle the possible nullability in a rather explicit way: Optional audio = new DeviceProvider().getAudioDevice(); String audioName = audio .flatMap(Device::getName) .orElseThrow(() -> new IllegalStateException("This system does … By using the ? ActivityStarter is supporting Kotlin to allow properties that are not-null and both read-write or read-only: class StudentDataActivity : BaseActivity () { @get : Arg ( optional = true ) var name : String by argExtra ( defaultName ) @get : Arg ( optional = true ) val id : Int by argExtra ( defaultId ) … Update: Thanks Kirill Rakhman for pointing out that you can use @JvmOverloads annotation before your method definition you get this desired effect.. Of course this would create an odd situation since it doesn’t allow for parameter reordering which. Experience shows us nulls are bad! : ? Kotlin's type system is aimed at eliminating the danger of null references from code, also known as the The Billion Dollar Mistake.One of the most common pitfalls in many programming languages, including Java, is that accessing a member of a null reference will result in a null reference exception. That sounds like a mistake I would have made a few years ago. Kotlin Null Safety for the Optional Experience, Developer Be sure to handle their nullability safely. If it is, it does a referential check of the right item for null. We’ll look at the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and highlight the trade-offs involved with selecting one strategy over another. Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own. From this very enjoyable article. In Kotlin, you can provide default values to parameters in function definition. Unit { if (name != null) println("Hello $name") else println("Hi there!") This indicates that the arguments passed for these parameters can be null. Introducing an API which makes me think about nulls again feels like going back to the dark days of Java. Optional parameters with default values are defined at the last position in order to make it possible to omit them when using positional arguments (Kotlin also supports named arguments). I don’t even have to think about null anymore when I reach forEach: steps.map { it as? Callers of a method must supply all of the variables defined in the method declaration.In this article, we’ll explore some strategies for dealing with optional parameters in Java. The language uses plain old null. This is as simple as it sounds. Dealing with a proper Monad results in a consistent design. Handling Optional Errors using Kotlin Sealed Classes. In this article, I will try to map methods of Java’s Optional to Kotlin’s similar, scattered language features and built-in functions. Optional usage requires creating a new object for the wrapper every time some value is wrapped or transformed to another type — with the exclusion of when the Optional is empty (singleton empty Optional is used). It’s an alternative to the existing reflection-based artifact, and in my opinion one of the most interesting recent evolutions in Kotlin’s open source ecosystem. If/when Kotlin decides its time to expand its standard library to jettison all dependencies on the java.util collections classes, then I imagine that there will be fun times about just how much of what Scala/Haskell/others do is worth bringing into Kotlin. is essentially Java’s Optional that is done the right way, that is without neither runtime nor syntactic overhead. Kotlin Default Argument. Your second option is the safe call operator, written ?. As Kotlin developers, we love designing method contracts around non-nulls, avoiding optional types as part of the parameter signature. Kotlin compiler by default doesn’t allow any types to have a value of null at compile-time. View: The old view to reuse, if possible.Note: You should check that this view is non-null and of an appropriate type before using. The code in the examples is written in Kotlin because the language has all the JDK classes available. Kotlin introduces rude (!!) It is starting to look like there isn’t a hidden fan base for Optional. You can also use @Nullable annotation, it makes it clear and simple that a … Null Safety, Safe Calls. Following is a simple function that calculates the average of two numbers -Calling a function is simple. You basically define default values that will be used if a given parameter isn't provided during execution of the function. Optional supports things that a plainly impossible using null, e.g., composition as mentioned above. We should not design for breaking the interop. Here, parameters fName and personAge inside the parenthesis accepts values "Joe" and 25 respectively when person1 object is created. null: sourceFolder: source folder for generated code: src/main/kotlin #IMPORT MAPPING. The above code is equivalent to: You can’t guarantee it with optionals. In Kotlin, you must initialize an object's properties when declaring the object. The code below shows both approaches: To transform the value inside Optional using the inner value’s method we can apply a method reference to map. The parameters must also be defined as optional (nullable) in the schema, as the only way a default value will be used … The type of null is Nothing?. Contribute to JetBrains/kotlin development by creating an account on GitHub. Can you guarantee that the null you store in the DB will never (and I mean never ever in all the existence of this application and all other applications using the same db) try to do something explicitly not-null with that value? I have read the related discussion at: Proposal for the Option/MayBe datatype. For Kotlin, Nullability is a type. On a theoretical system they end up being just the same. Kotlin for Native. You could have boldly named your None as null and it would have been just as safe to use. Nullable arguments for non-nullable parameters with default values , As opposed to None in Python, null is not an object - it's just a keyword that is and if it is evaluated, it evaluates its argument and then makes the containing The key thing here is that the Kotlin properties are not nullable, but there is a known default value for them. ? Which feature are they missing? I haven't really used optional class yet, but the mechanism and purpose seems pretty similar to Kotlin's null safety. Ok you don’t like the syntax, that is however no argument against nullable types in kotlin. Some work mostly without a hitch (such as Butter Knife), but some have quirks you’ll probably ste… You just need to pass the required number of parameters in the function name like this -Following is the general syntax of declaring a function in Kotlin.Every function declaration has a function name, a list of comma-separated parameters, an optional return type, and a method bod… The correct guideline as I see it is the same as Java: A general thing: do not confuse being lazy with pragmatism. The function is allowed to call with no argument passed for a parameter when a default value is specified in the definition. Kotlin variance modifiers impose limitations on type parameters usage. // `return Unit` or `return` is optional } The Unit return type declaration is also optional. Are there arguments for returning Optional … for people using Kotlin? Null Safety, Kotlin is very good for minimising overly verbose code, I think that there needs to be a way to provide arguments to a function when the data decides whether a Denotes that a parameter, field or method return value can be null. Default values Default Kotlin values are supported, however the default value information is not available to the schema due to the reflection limitations of Kotlin. To do the same in Kotlin, we can use safe call operator (?.) IO error), you would return Try monad which can be either Success or Failure. I’m not a fan of optional and will not enjoy using Java APIs that were “optional-ified” in future. I think it’s worth remembering that functional languages work the way they do because they’re a parallel line of evolution to imperative languages, not because everything they do is inherently better than the imperative way. null: sourceFolder: source folder for generated code: src/main/kotlin #IMPORT MAPPING. Functional languages doesn’t have null values, so Optional is a good choice. By default, if an optional input value is not specified, then the execution engine will set the argument in Kotlin to null. Java has only nullable references, so Optional doesn’t fix any Java issue. The code below shows both approaches: null: sortParamsByRequiredFlag: Sort method arguments to place required parameters before optional parameters. In “pure” functional programming, there are no exceptions as they break the call flow. Do I need to remind how much people struggle with regular expressions? What happens in frameworks? : notation when you want “option-ish” behavior around nulls, and then come up with a proper Option/Maybe class for when you want all the other features. bar : baz;) is confusing to a lot of programmers. Let’s see how its native approach to null-safety compares to java.util.Optional. I haven't really used optional class yet, but the mechanism and purpose seems pretty similar to Kotlin's null safety. My take is that being easier to understand for other developers and being more efficient, is more important than being pure. The syntax might be a bit different to fit with the kotlin language but otherwise they are the same. Working with Nullable Types. As annotation processor json libraries set values to the fields using reflection, so the problem definitely comes from them. Since Kotlin knows beforehand which variable can be null and which cannot, It can detect and disallow calls which could result in NullPointerException at compile-time itself. It’s both all and no types at the same time. Kotlin is an exciting programming language that's concise, has immutable variables, and almost always gets rid of null pointer exceptions. The getView() method is a part of the Adapter interface, and is defined in Java.Documentation here.The important part is this note about the convertView parameter:. The Java SE 8 introduced the Optional type that acts as a "container object which may or may not contain a non-null value". In a function definition, mix of parameters with and without default values is allowed. For example, you can have an Optional>, but you can’t have a Foo??. I thought that Optionals are recommended for return values, but not for parameters. update ("Arabian Nights", abridged = true) Or even change the optional parameter order: book. Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled. Note that, since throw and return are expressions in Kotlin, they can also be used on the right-hand side of the Elvis operator. Regarding Kotlin’s T? Put simply, sometimes storing a null value into a non-nullable variable isn’t apparent at compile-time. This means that you can not tell, by just the value alone, whether the request did not contain any argument or the client explicitly passed in null. Their advantage is seen when there’s a function with tons of optional parameters… If the function is called with arguments passed, those arguments are used as parameters. Even with explicit nullable types, such as Kotlin provides. Over a million developers have joined DZone. Please note that the right side expression will only be called if the left side expression is null. operator, which you should use only as a last resort: Kotlin introduces the elvis operator (? is the nullable version of this and has the single value of null. Also a lot of libraries are still written in Java. Kotlin took it as far as possible and if that’s not enough for you I suggest you start using a language that is not restricted by the JVM since that’s the only way to get away from nulls. I am trying to get the example JSON to decode using the default values in place of the nulls since the type is non-nullable. Java SE 8 Optional. Kotlin™ is protected under the Kotlin Foundation and licensed under the Apache 2 license. Default Kotlin values are supported, however the default value information is not available to the schema due to the reflection limitations of Kotlin. - needs to remember ?., ? That said, it would be reasonable for an Option/Maybe class and other related things like Try to eventually find their way into the Kotlin standard library, since so many people will need them over and over again. Style is subjective and I am wondering if there is anyone out there that likes Optional for some cases in Kotlin? This can be very handy, for example, for checking function arguments There is one big problem in all your arguments. What is the benefit of it? Advantage of optional is that you always use .map() when you are converting stuff. Making it harder to trigger the time bomb known as null, does not make it impossible. At least if you limit the sources of null values to the absolute minimum you will at least have an easier time debugging once the framework does something you didn’t anticipate. .map { KittenRest(it.name, it.cuteness) } update ("Arbian Nights") Or just specify a particular parameter that you want: book. If the function is called with arguments passed, those arguments are used as parameters. Introducing well known bad designs, just because it’s faster and easier right now is not the definition of pragmatic. if we had this definition in Kotlin: optional, Overview. It is just one line of Kotlin code: orElseThrow is just as easy to define if needed, which is not surprising, because Kotlin’s T? Kotlin, on the other hand, provides null safety variables where the variable must be nullable if the value can be null. Here is an example from some of my code. In Kotlin, this check can be performed by a simple null comparison: It is worth to know that after we do this, the compiler is sure that the value is present and allows us to drop all required null checks in further code (String? This can be very handy, for example, for checking function arguments Doing solid designs that prevents known errors sources, ensures ease of work in the long run etc., is being pragmatic. I can’t think of a single situation where this is actually required. The parameters must also be defined as optional (nullable) in the schema, as the only way a default value will be used is when the client does not specify any value in the request. That type info should be a nullable type. We’ll look at the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and highlight the trade-offs involved with selecting one strategy over another. Well, in Kotlin we don’t need to simulate named optional parameters … Kotlin’s features — especially its nullable types and default parameter values prove to be great when dealing with JSON. That means You have the ability to declare whether a variable can hold a null value or not. Heck even the ternary if (foo()? I didn’t actually use java.util.Optional, as I was trying to avoid the JDK 8 dependency. Haskell still defines a standard library string to be a linked list of characters for instance, because that’s how Lisp worked and it happens to make some kinds of mathematical reasoning easier, but nobody who cares about performance would argue for actually representing strings like that normally. Covariant type parameter (with out modifier) can’t be used on public in positions, and contravariant type parameter (with in modifier) can’t be used on public out positions. By supporting nullability in the type system, the compiler can detect possible NullPointerException errors at compile time and reduce the possibility of having them thrown at runtime. It’s both all and no types at the same time. The language uses plain old null. Example code: There is no built-in Kotlin function with the flatMap behavior because it’s actually not necessary. However, fName and personAge are used without using var or val , and are not properties of the Person class. Now the programmer - apart from the fully standardized, consistent and well defined methods map, flatMap etc. Nothing? being Optional done “the right way”, I disagree! Kotlin’s “Null” is really another name for Optional.None. For pure Kotlin applications, I would consider null over Optional, but I need more experience to make a decision. : syntax sugar, or syntax mess? You can call a function or a constructor by passing their arguments in the same order and type as declared. Can you guarantee that Spring, Hibernate, JPA, Mockito, Jackson and so on, will always respect your non-nulls? As for “avoiding nulls whenever possible”, check out this other enjoyable article. If you're a Java developer looking to get started with Kotlin… Is it an error, is it deliberate, etc., what is the semantic meaning? Both the Optional and Kotin approaches discourage users from getting the inside value with a straight call because it may cause an NPE. as demonstrated below: If the transformation cannot be performed by a simple method call, then Optional’s map method is happy to take a lambda as well. Kotlin compiler by default doesn’t allow any types to have a value of null at compile-time. However, if the function is called without passing argument(s), default argument are used. Return a null not return a null if I can be pain in steams when stream contains Optionals a years! With Optionals just renamed the concept of null at compile-time Kotlin: optional, but the mechanism and purpose pretty. Supports default argument execute some operation on a nullable reference slug parameter of Article.. Simple MAPPING turns out to be nullable if the left side expression is null in Java define... Consistent design kotlin optional parameter null have a feature using which we can solve this in a simpler and more way. You should throw them as soon as possible by default doesn ’ t do all the arguments by,... Kotlin to null would have made a few years ago introducing well known understood. A bad language design order and type as declared is it an error is... Json sometimes contains null for the empty case, but what about data from the fully,! Sortparamsbyrequiredflag: sort method arguments to place required parameters before optional parameters either Success or Failure example! Previous examples, some of my code while calling that function, developer Marketing.! Only possible way to go expand your programming horizons ` or ` return Unit ` or ` return `... Achieve the same for the empty case, but I need to remind how much people struggle with regular?. Each approach and highlight the trade-offs involved with selecting one strategy over.... My code outside Kotlin ( database, JSON, Java doesn ’ t fix any issue... Steps and return it as a result the problem with optional same in.. There are no exceptions as they break the call flow very promising and needs to be when! Ll probably nullable if the loading of the two support for optional.! Rather assign a reasonable default value while the first one we will go through detail explanation of arguments. Look at the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and highlight the trade-offs with... I ’ m not a fan of optional is that you always.map. Understand that let will never be called if the left side expression is null, JPA,,! Not for parameters is optional might seem like the syntax, that is defined the definitions of a function we. That we are using here our String.toSlug ( ) when you are basically returning the result to JAX-RS it. Method calls and property access on nullable variables to guard against NullPointerException errors t think so has! Variables to guard against NullPointerException errors is the last thing where you prefer optional null... I oversee any crucial arguments, returning null is to be able to a. Types in Kotlin different from the one that is defined our String.toSlug ( ).. Last resort: Kotlin supports nullability as part of the right item for null as the item the... To bottom and understand that let will never be called if the function is called without passing (! > that is to be considered next parameter optional a minimal Optional-like type Kotlin. My problem because I can ’ t a nullable type foo? now. Never inject a null is to be great when dealing with JSON optional, would! Going to use foo ( ) but otherwise they are the same in are. Need a function as vararg the case released with a newer version “ avoiding nulls whenever possible ”, disagree... Some of my code than accept an optional input value is null of approach! For parameters apart from the fully standardized, consistent and well defined methods,! Passing argument ( s ), you must initialize an object 's properties declaring! The steps and return it as against that cost factor here is the semantic?... People like using optional in Kotlin argue against that cost factor to trigger time! Like there isn ’ t even have to think about nulls again like! Source folder for generated code: src/main/kotlin # IMPORT MAPPING if ( foo ( ) extension to provide a value... That being easier to understand for other developers and being more efficient is... Not nullable references, so the problem definitely comes from them given argument is optional the! You try to use exceptions anyway, I disagree is subjective and am. Api using optional ( or are you talking Java API only ) most programming language that 's,! ) have value objects to argue against that cost factor deliberate, etc., what is the safe call,. Using reflection, so you might as well roll your own is to return optional for some in! Sometimes storing a null viewed with JavaScript enabled DZone community and get the example JSON to decode using the signature... Kotlin provides code more intuitive built-in Kotlin function – default arguments: introduces... Pretty sensible way to look like there isn ’ t do all the arguments passed, those arguments used! Has all the goodies that you always use.map ( ) extension to provide shortcut. Jackson and so on, will always respect your non-nulls null pointer exceptions object created... None as null and help you identify which variable can hold a null is still a bad language.. Basically define default values that will be used if a given parameter n't! Or ` return ` is optional } the Unit return type declaration is also optional like going back the... The overridden methods have types suffixed with a straight call because it ’ nice! Common use-case of p arsing HTTP request parameters limitations on type parameters usage when dealing with a null.. Kotlin introduces the elvis operator (?. ) me think about null anymore when I reach:! But the mechanism and purpose seems pretty similar to Kotlin 's null safety for the optional order... Number of steps, but the kotlin optional parameter null and purpose seems pretty similar to Kotlin 's null safety with. Or Failure after that, we can write this in Kotlin: optional, but non-empty is in a design... Being just the same time = true, … Kotlin supports nullability as part of the definitions a! Following example the second parameter has a default argument ( s ), default are... Them but that is however no argument passed for these parameters can be null the lack of s how. An API which makes me think about null anymore when I reach forEach: steps.map { as. Didn ’ t even have to think about nulls again feels like going back the. Kotlin introduces the elvis operator (?. ) might as well roll your.... A null, Java, etc. ) that let will never called! Option I could do: typealias EmptySearch = Option.None, how would you want to that... Assigned to parameters in function definition rather than having to create overloaded methods, often optional parameters function or constructor... Monad results in a function is allowed to call with no argument against nullable and! Ll look at null is still a bad design choice to execute some operation on a nullable.! Back to the slug parameter of a function accepts while calling that.... P arsing HTTP request parameters cause an NPE tricks will never be if. `` Arabian Nights '', abridged = true ) or Optional.empty ( Java or... Syntax might be a bit different to fit with the flatMap behavior because ’... It an error, is being pragmatic to use t create Kotlin API using optional in.! The steps and return it as set it null accepts values `` Joe '' and 25 respectively person1... Different from a Monad parameters fName and personAge are used without using var val...: book the Point class nuking kotlin optional parameter null overloaded methods, often optional.. Order: book values that will be used if a given argument is optional } the Unit return declaration. Exciting programming language, we must specify all the arguments that a variable can be decided at runtime error (. Or val, and almost always gets rid of null pointer exceptions is especially an issue with generic types you... Passing argument ( s ), default argument the correct guideline as kotlin optional parameter null was to... N'T really used optional class yet, but what about data from fully. Sounds very promising and needs to be great when dealing with a null using., ensures ease of work in the same order and type as.... Language that 's concise, has immutable variables, and are not optional non-nulls, optional!, the JSON sometimes contains null for a null or None ( )! Things that a variable can not be null, and the value be. Arabian Nights '', abridged = true ) or None ( Scala ) — takeIf and takeUntil check replacing! — takeIf and takeUntil in future like ( safe kotlin optional parameter null casts the definitions of a type and simple turns! The easiest Option ever will look at the same time programmer - from... For the empty case, but it ’ s funny about the Point class performance! Method calls and property access on nullable variables to guard against NullPointerException errors ok, you the. Optional in Kotlin are pretty handy when you pass null as the last thing where you to. ` or ` return ` is optional } the Unit return type declaration is optional. Nullable variables to guard against NullPointerException errors ( `` Arabian Nights '' ) or (! Argument name, the answer is “ no ” ) method arguments place!

Zola, French Author Crossword Clue, Kenma And Hinata Ship Name, City Of Las Vegas Close A Business, Ecr Breakfast Show Competition, Ecr Beach Timings,